UKabc is an activity of the UK Food Group. Click here for UK Food Group Home Page Click here to return to UKabc Home Page
UKabc Noticeboard UKabc Noticeboard, Latest Updates [Alpacas watching out]
Sustaining Agricultural Biodiversity Sustaining Agricultural Biodiversity, Agro-ecosystems and Production. & Introduction to Agricultural Biodiversity issues [Maragwa Seed Show 1998, Kenya]
Governance Governance and Advocacy: the International Agricultural Biodiversity Agenda [Logos of FAO, WTO, CBD, CSD]
Genetic Engineering Regulating Genetic Engineering, Biotechnology and Biosafety [GenetiX symbol in sunflower]
IPRs, Access & Benefit Sharing Benefit Sharing, Intellectual Property, TRIPs [Women sorting seed potatoes in Peru]
Links Open Directory Project for links on Agricultural Biodiversity [Artisanal fisherfolk launching boat in Kerala, India]
Contact UKabc Site maintained by Patrick Mulvany, ITDG - PRACTICAL ANSWERS TO POVERTY

• 12•07•2002 •

Get Acrobat Reader to read PDF files
for PDF file - use Acrobat Reader files

FAO WORLD FOOD SUMMIT - 5½ years later

NGO/CSO FORUM for Food Sovereignty, Rome, 8-13 June 2002

International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
- the "International Seed Treaty" and other genetic resources issues - dominated the FAO World Food Summit: 5½ years later

NGO/CSO FORUM for Food Sovereignty
8-13 June 2002

Top of Page

Summary of Decisions by International Committee

The International NGO/CSO Planning Committee for the WFS:fyl met in Rome from 3rd to 5th November in FAO.HQ.

The International Committee meeting reviewed action taken so far regarding both the content of the strategic themes identified by the Committee on may 2001 and the process of preparation in the regions, and then proceeded to update the NGO/CSO strategy and workplan. A statement for the FAO Conference was prepared.

The decisions of the meeting are summarised under the following headings:

Thematic work

Top of Page

The NGOs/CSOs will focus on a limited number of issues which are the key to reach WFS goals. Draft position papers have been prepared on the following strategic issues: right to food, food sovereignty, alternative models of agriculture, access to productive resources (land and genetic resources).

The meeting decided that the authors of these papers will prepare redrafts taking comments received into account.

DECISION 1: Additional papers will be prepared on access to water, biotechnology and indigenous peoples' rights.

The revised drafts and new papers will be shared with the regional focal points and finalized by 15 January 2002 so that they can be discussed at the NGO/CSO Regional Consultations, starting with Africa in early February.

DECISION 2: At the same time, a "condensed political paper" will be prepared by a drafting committee to serve as the basis for NGO/CSO advocacy at the WFS:fyl. This paper will group issues around three themes:

  • Rights: to food and resources (including issues of land rights and security of tenure, water, biodiversity), workers' rights, indigenous peoples' rights;

  • Alternative agricultural models (including a critique of industrial models, presentation of existing alternative models, access to and choice of technology, GMO issues);

  • Food sovereignty (including issues on democracy and participation, countries'/peoples' right to decide their agricultural and food policies, trade issues, prices, dumping, food safety).

  • Revise call to action

This document will also be discussed at the Regional Consultations and will be finalized only at the eve of the Summit.


Preparation Process

Top of Page

Regional focal points reported on action taken so far to promote reflection and dialogue at local, national, sub-regional and regional levels. Progress has been made in ensuring civil society involvement in official preparation mechanisms. Reports were given on the NGO/CSO consultations which have taken place in all five regions and in North America.

With the postponement of the WFS:fyl, the regional processes that will be taking place over the coming months take on great importance.

DECISION 3. It is proposed to hold NGO/CSO Consultations in conjunction with the Regional FAO Conferences in 2002.

The Committee expressed the hope that the General Director will be available to discuss with the NGOs/CSOs when he attends the Regional Conferences.

The Regional NGO/CSO Consultations are expected to provide an occasion for NGOs/CSOs to discuss and comment on the draft NGO/CSO political paper; to build a dialogue with the members of the governments; to feed in their comments regarding the draft declaration to the FAO Regional Conferences and the CFS; to make recommendations regarding on-going cooperation with FAO.


Africa El Cairo (Egypt) 4 - 8 Feb 2002

North Africa and Near East Teheran (Iran) 9 - 13 March 2002

Latin America La Havana (Cuba) 22 - 26 April 2002

Europe Cyprus 27 - 30 May 2002 Asia Kathmandu (Nepal) 13 - 17 May 2002

Committee on Food Security Rome (Italy) 6 - 8 June 2002

The Committee proposed that the regional NGO/CSO focal points meet with their counterparts in the FAO Regional Offices over the coming weeks to plan for these Consultations, and that one of the NGO/CSO focal points visit the host to make contact with national NGOs and help to set up a host NGO committee for the Regional Consultation.

The NGOs/CSOs also plan to reinforce consultations and dialogue at national and sub-regional levels.

The IPC is planning an international consultation for indigenous people

DECISION 4. Preparatory papers will be translated/adapted into local languages wherever possible..

Efforts will be made to take advantage of other regional processes in course, particularly in the context of preparations for the Johannesburg WSSD

DECISION 5. Existing campaigns on related themes (moratorium on GMOs, no dumping etc.) are part of NGO/CSO preparation effort and need to be supported internationally.

DECISION 6. Media and communication strategies will be implemented at national, regional and global levels, including preparation of videos bringing the voices of farmer, women, workers, indigenous peoples' leaders to the NGO Forum and the Summit.


 NGO/CSO Forum

Top of Page

DECISION 7. The Forum is entitled "NGO/CSO Forum for Food Sovereignty". It will take place from 8 to 13 June 2002. Some 600 participants will be accredited, nominated by the regional and constituency focal points of the Committee, according to a quota system that will ensure balanced representation by regions, types of organizations, and gender.

The detailed programme of the Forum including its interaction with the Summit will be developed over the coming months.

DECISION 8. The work of the FORUM will involve strategic discussions in morning sessions open only to accredited delegates; thematic workshops on strategic issues, to be organized in the afternoons both at the Forum and on FAO premises; debate with government delegations, including in the context of the Multistakeholder Dialogue which figures in the WFS:fyl programme. The International NGO/CSO Planning for the WFS:fyl is FAO's civil society interface for the planning and implementation of this MSD. The International Committee intends to prepare for the MSD already in the context of the Regional Conferences, so that dialogue can be built up progressively; information/education activities open to the public at large.

DECISION 9. The first two days (8-9 June), will be devoted to finalize the NGO/CSO declaration to be presented to the WFS:fyl and to take the final decisions on concrete goals and follow-up proposals, including monitoring of the WFS:fyl decisions and on-going

DECISION 10 The relations with FAO are strategically important and the dialogue of this past month must be continued.

Decision 11 New members of the IPC have been accepted during the meeting

Top of Page

Global Forum on Food Sovereignty

Top of Page

Final Declaration of the World Forum on Food Sovereignty Havana, Cuba, September 7, 2001

Havana Declaration PDF file - use Acrobat Reader PDF file

For the peoples' right to produce, feed themselves and exercise their food sovereignty
From September 3 to 7, 2001, some 400 delegates from peasant and indigenous organizations, fishing associations, non-governmental organizations, social agencies, academics and researchers from 60 countries around the world met in Havana, Cuba at the World Forum on Food Sovereignty.

This Forum was convened in Cuba by the Cuban National Association of Small Farmers and a group of international movements, networks, organizations and people committed to peasant and indigenous agriculture, artisanal fisheries, sustainable food systems and the peoples' right to feed themselves. It also serves as recognition of the efforts of a Third World country which, despite suffering over four decades of the illegal and inhuman blockade imposed by the United States and the use of food as a weapon of economic and political pressure, has managed to guarantee the human right to nutrition for all of its population by way of a coherent, active, participatory and long-term state policy based on profound agrarian reform, appreciation and support for small and medium-sized producers, and the participation and mobilization of the entire society.

We gathered to analyze the reasons why hunger and malnutrition grow every day throughout the world, why the crisis in peasant and indigenous agriculture, artisanal fisheries and sustainable food systems has worsened, and why the peoples are losing sovereignty over their resources. Likewise, we gathered to collectively develop, from the perspective of the peoples and not the transnational food corporations, viable proposals, alternatives and strategies for action on a local, national and global scale, aimed at reversing current trends and promoting new focuses, policies and initiatives that can guarantee a dignified and hunger-free present and future for all the men and women of the world.

Five years after the World Food Summit, seven years after the agricultural agreements of the GATT (now WTO) Uruguay Round, and following two decades of the application of neoliberal policies by a large part of governments, the promises and commitments made to satisfy the food and nutritional needs of all are far from being fulfilled. On the contrary, the reality is that the economic, agricultural, fishing and trade policies imposed by the World Bank, IMF and WTO, promoted by the transnational corporations, have widened the gap between the wealthy and poor countries and accentuated the unequal distribution of earnings within countries. They have worsened the conditions of food production and access to healthy and sufficient nutrition for the majority of the world's peoples, even in the so-called developed countries.

As a consequence, the most basic human right of all, the right to food and nutritional well-being enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is not guaranteed to the majority of the world's peoples. The sustainability of food systems is not merely a technical matter. It constitutes a challenge demanding the highest political will of states.

The profit motive leads to the unsustainability of food systems by surpassing the limits on production allowed by nature. The sustainability of food systems is not viable within the current trade system and the context of liberalization promoted by the WTO and international financial organizations. The hope for a new millennium free of hunger has been frustrated, to the shame of all humanity.

The real causes of hunger and malnutrition Hunger, malnutrition and the exclusion of millions of people from access to productive goods and resources, such as land, the forests, the seas, water, seeds, technology and know-how, are not a result of fate, of happenstance, of geographical location or climatic phenomena. Above all, they are a consequence of determined economic, agricultural and trade policies on a global, regional and national scale that have been imposed by the powers of the developed countries and their corporations for the purpose of maintaining and increasing their political, economic, cultural and military hegemony within the current process of global economic restructuring.

In the face of the neoliberal ideological theories behind these policies:
- We affirm that food is not just another merchandise and that the food system cannot be viewed solely according to market logic.
- We consider as fallacious the argument that the liberalization of international agricultural and fishing trade guarantees the people's right to food. - Trade liberalization does not necessarily facilitate the economic growth and well-being of the population.
- The underdeveloped countries are capable of producing their own food and could be capable of doing so in the future.
- The neoliberal concept of comparative advantages severely affects food systems. In keeping with this concept, the importing of basic food commodities leads to the dismantling of domestic production, given the possibility of buying them "cheaper" from the wealthy countries.

This in turn leads to the reorientation of their productive resources towards export crops that are "more competitive and have greater value added" for the First World markets. It is a lie that countries should not be concerned with establishing and implementing state policies to guarantee food security for their citizens. Neoliberal theorists argue that the global supermarket of exporter countries can satisfy any demands with no problems whatsoever.
- They try to deceive the population when they claim that peasant and indigenous farmers and artisanal fisheries are inefficient and unable to meet the growing needs for food production. They use this claim in the attempt to impose widescale, intensive industrial agriculture and fishing.
- We denounce as false the argument that the rural population is overly large in comparison with its contribution to the gross domestic product. In reality, this reflects an attempt to brutally expel the rural population from its lands and fishing communities from the coasts and seas, privatizing natural resources.
- We reject the use of widescale, intensive industrial agriculture and fishing as the means to confront the world's growing food needs.
- They attempt to convince us that the only alternative for peasants, fishers and indigenous peoples is to give way to the privatization of their lands and natural resources. This leads, among other effects, to massive migration to the cities and abroad in order to expand the supply of cheap labor needed to increase the "competitiveness" of the dynamic sectors of national economies linked to exports and transnational corporations. At the same time, unemployment and the loss of jobs are on the rise in the developed countries.
- There is an attempt to impose the food model of the transnational corporations as the only viable, appropriate and correct model in a global world. This is veritable food imperialism, which threatens the diversity of the peoples' food cultures and their national, cultural and ethnic identities. - In this context, the hegemonic powers use food as a weapon of political and economic pressure against sovereign countries and popular resistance movements.
- All of the above is taking place within the framework of the systematic weakening of states and the promotion of false democracies that systematically disregard the public interest and real participation of society in general and the rural population in particular in the discussion, design, adoption, implementation and control of public policies.

The consequences of neoliberal policies and the consequences of these false and erroneous policies are visible: they have increased the sales and profits of the economic powers of the developed countries, while the peoples of the Third World have seen the growth of their external debt and heightened levels of poverty, extreme poverty and social exclusion. The concentration of the international agricultural market within a number of transnational corporations has been accelerated, while the dependence and food insecurity of the majority of peoples has increased.

There continue to be heavy subsidies for export agriculture and fishing, at the same time that many governments provide absolutely no protection for small and medium-sized producers who produce mainly for the domestic market. Policies of production and export subsidies in the developed countries allow the transnationals to acquire products at very low prices and sell them at much higher prices to consumers in both the South and the North. Neoliberal policies towards the countryside have in fact promoted a process of forced deruralization of vast proportions and dramatic consequences, a genuine war against peasant and indigenous agriculture, which in some cases has come to constitute veritable genocide and ethnicide. Artisanal fishing communities have been increasingly losing access to their own resources.

As a result of neoliberal policies, hunger and malnutrition are growing, not because of an absence of food, but rather because of an absence of rights. We are witnesses of examples that allow us to assert that the eradication of hunger and malnutrition and the exercise of lasting and sustainable food sovereignty are possible. Likewise, we have seen in practically every country countless examples of sustainable and organic food production in peasant and indigenous communities and sustainable and diversified management of rural areas. In view of the foregoing, the participants in the World Forum on Food Sovereignty declare:

1. Food sovereignty is the means to eradicate hunger and malnutrition and to guarantee lasting and sustainable food security for all of the peoples. We define food sovereignty as the peoples' right to define their own policies and strategies for the sustainable production, distribution and consumption of food that guarantee the right to food for the entire population, on the basis of small and medium-sized production, respecting their own cultures and the diversity of peasant, fishing and indigenous forms of agricultural production, marketing and management of rural areas, in which women play a fundamental role.
2. Food sovereignty fosters the economic, political and cultural sovereignty of the peoples.
3. Food sovereignty recognizes agriculture involving peasants, indigenous peoples and fishing communities with links to the territory; primarily oriented towards the satisfaction of the needs of the local and national markets; agriculture whose central concern is human beings; agriculture which preserves, values and fosters the multifunctionality of peasant and indigenous forms of production and management of rural areas. Likewise, food sovereignty entails the recognition and appreciation of the economic, social, environmental and cultural advantages of small-scale, family-based, peasant and indigenous agriculture.
4. We consider the recognition of the rights, autonomy and culture of indigenous peoples in all countries as an imperative requisite for combating hunger and malnutrition and guaranteeing the right to food for the population. Food sovereignty implies the recognition of the multi-ethnicity of nations and the recognition and appreciation of the identities of aboriginal peoples. This implies, as well, the recognition of autonomous control of their territories, natural resources, systems of production and management of rural areas, seeds, knowledge and organizational forms. In this sense, we support the struggles of all of the indigenous peoples and peoples of African descent in the world, and demand full respect for their rights.
5. Food sovereignty further implies the guarantee of access to healthy and sufficient food for all individuals, particularly for the most vulnerable sectors, as an imperative obligation for national governments and the full exercise of civil rights. Access to food should not be viewed as a form of assistance from governments or of charity from national or international public or private entities.
6. Food sovereignty implies the implementation of radical processes of comprehensive agrarian reform adapted to the conditions of each country and region, which will provide peasant and indigenous farmers - with equal opportunities for women - with equitable access to productive resources, primarily land, water and forests, as well as the means of production, financing, training and capacity building for management and interlocution. Agrarian reform, above all, should be recognized as an obligation of national governments where this process is necessary within the framework of human rights and as an efficient public policy to combat poverty. These agrarian reform processes must be controlled by peasant organizations - including the land rents market - and guarantee both individual and collective rights of producers over shared lands, as articulated in coherent agricultural and trade policies. We oppose the policies and programs for the commercialization of land promoted by the World Bank instead of true agrarian reforms accepted by governments.
7. We support the proposal put forward by civil society organizations in 1996, calling for states to draw up a code of conduct on the human right to adequate food, to effectively serve as an instrument for the implementation and promotion of this right. The peoples' right to food is included in the Declaration of Human Rights and was ratified at the World Food Summit in Rome in 1996 by the member states of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
8. We propose the most rapid ratification possible and application by a larger number of countries of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1966.
9. In defense of the principle of the people's inalienable right to food, we propose the adoption by the United Nations of an International Convention on Food Sovereignty and Nutritional Well-Being, which should rule over decisions adopted in the fields of international trade and other domains.
10. International food trade should be subordinated to the supreme purpose of serving human beings. Food sovereignty does not mean autarchy, full self-sufficiency or the disappearance of international agricultural and fishing trade.
11. We oppose any interference by the WTO in food, agriculture and fishing and its attempt to determine national food policies. We categorically oppose its agreements on intellectual property rights over plants and other living organisms, as well as its intention to carry out a new round of negotiations (the so-called Millennium Round) including new themes for negotiation. Keep the WTO out of food.
12. We propose the creation of a new democratic and transparent order for the regulation of international trade, including the creation of an international appeals court independent of the WTO and the strengthening of UNCTAD as a forum for multilateral negotiations on fair food trade. At the same time, we propose the promotion of regional integration schemes among producers' organizations, unrelated to neoliberal goals and parameters.
13. We demand an immediate end to dishonest practices that establish market prices below production costs and provide subsidies for production and exports.
14. We oppose the FTAA, which is nothing more than a hegemonic strategic plan developed by the United States to consolidate its control over Latin America and the Caribbean, expand its economic borders, and guarantee itself a large captive market.
15. We support the demands made by peasant and social organizations in Mexico for the suspension of the NAFTA agreements concerning agriculture.
16. Genetic resources are the result of millennia of evolution and belong to all of humanity. Therefore, there should be a prohibition on biopiracy and patents on living organisms, including the development of sterile varieties through genetic engineering processes. Seeds are the patrimony of all of humanity. The monopolization by a number of transnational corporations of the technologies to create genetically modified organisms (GMOs) represents a grave threat to the peoples' food sovereignty. At the same time, in light of the fact that the effects of GMOs on health and the environment are unknown, we demand a ban on open experimentation, production and marketing until there is conclusive knowledge of their nature and impact, strictly applying the principle of precaution.
17. It is necessary to promote widespread dissemination and appreciation of the agricultural history and food culture of every country, while denouncing the imposition of food models alien to the food cultures of the peoples.
18. We express our determination to integrate the goals of nutritional well-being into national food policies and programs, including local productive systems, promoting their diversification towards foods rich in micronutrients; to defend the quality and safety of foods consumed by populations; and to fight for the right of all individuals to information on the foods they consume, by stepping up regulations on food labels and the content of food-related advertising, exercising the principle of precaution.
19. Food sovereignty should be founded on diversified systems of production, based on ecologically sustainable technologies. It is essential to develop initiatives for sustainable food production and consumption generated at the local level by small producers, with the establishment of public policies that contribute to building sustainable food systems around the world.
20. We demand the justly deserved appreciation of peasant, indigenous and fishing communities for their sustainable and diversified management of rural areas, through appropriate prices and incentive programs.
21. When addressing the problem of food on a worldwide scale, we must take into account the cultural diversity that leads to different local and regional contexts, because the protection of the environment and biodiversity are closely related to the recognition of cultural diversity.
22. The development of sustainable food systems must include nutritional considerations, such as the demand for the regulation of the handling of agrotoxins.
23. We recognize and appreciate the fundamental role played by women in the production, harvesting, marketing and preparation of the products of agriculture and fishing and in passing on the food cultures of the peoples. We support the struggles waged by women for access to productive resources, and for their right to produce and consume local products.
24. Artisanal fishers and their organizations will not relinquish their rights to free access to fishing resources and the establishment and protection of reserve areas for the exclusive use of artisanal fishing methods. Likewise, we demand recognition of ancestral and historic rights over the coasts and inland waters.
25. Food aid policies and programs must be reviewed. They should not be an inhibiting factor for the development of local and national food production capacities, nor should they foster dependence, the distortion of local and national markets, corruption, or the dumping of foods that are harmful to health, particularly with regard to GMOs.
26. Food sovereignty can only be achieved, defended and exercised through the democratic strengthening of states and the self-organization, initiative and mobilization of all of society. It requires long-term state policies, an effective democratization of public policies, and the development of a solidarity-based social setting.
27. We condemn the U.S. policy of blockading Cuba and other peoples and the use of food as a weapon of economic and political pressure against countries and popular movements. This unilateral policy must end immediately.
28. Food sovereignty is a civil concept that concerns society as a whole. For this reason, social dialogue should be open to all the social sectors involved.
29. Achieving food sovereignty and eradicating hunger and malnutrition are possible in all countries and for all peoples. We express our determination to continue struggling against neoliberal globalization, maintaining and increasing active social mobilization, building strategic alliances and adopting firm political decisions.
30. We agree to launch a call for intensive activity and widespread mobilization around the following focuses of struggle:
* Declaring October 16 as World Food Sovereignty Day, known until now as World Food Day.
* Demanding that the World Food Summit Five Years Later go ahead as planned from November 5 to 10 of this year, and that the FAO fully assume its mandate and responsibility. Social organizations should organize events at the national and continental level to promote their proposals and pressure official delegations.
* Demanding that the Italian government fully respect the freedom to demonstrate and refrain from repressing social movements opposed to neoliberal globalization.
* Participating in and mobilizing around the WTO Ministerial Meeting, to be held in Qatar from November 9 to 13, 2001; the Hemispheric Conference Against the FTAA, to be held in Havana from November 13 to 16, 2001; and the 2nd World Social Forum, to be held in Porto Alegre from January 31 to February 6, 2002. Done at the International Conference Center in Havana, Cuba on September 7, 2001 Keep the WTO out of food Another world is possible

Top of Page

Fidel Castro at the World Food Summit, 1996

What will be his evaluation in 2002? There are still 800m malnourished people and more than 30,000 die daily. Hunger stalks the planet and famines strike with impunity. Reflecting on what Castro asked world leaders in at the World Food Summit in 1996, has society tried to eradicate hunger, is it still collectively ignorant or just foolish?

Reflect on this. Despite the rhetoric of dozens of powerful world leaders in 1996 about addressing hunger, Cuba is the only country to have done something about it. It has instituted a radically different food and agriculture policy, based on agroecological principles. Hundreds of thousands of people have been trained to grow food organically. The health of their peoples and country has improved dramatically.

This is what Castro said in 1996.

The following is a speech given by president Fidel Castro Ruz, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba, at the World Food Summit, held at the headquarters of the Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, November 16, 1996.

(From Granma Internet #18, November 19, 1996)

Mr. President,
Mr. Director-General of the FAO,
Your Excellencies:

Hunger, the inseparable companion of the poor, is the result of the unequal distribution of wealth and of the injustices of this world. The rich do not know hunger.

Colonialism was no stranger to the underdevelopment and poverty that today is suffered by a large part of humanity. Nor are the offensive opulence or the extravagances of the consumer societies of the former metropolises which exploited a large part of the countries of the Earth. Fighting against hunger and injustice, millions of people have died.

What bandages are we to apply so that within 20 years there are 400 million, instead of 800 million, starving people? These goals, if only for their modesty, are shameful.

If 35,000 people starve to death each day, half of them children, why is it that in developed countries olive groves are uprooted, flocks sacrificed, and great sums are paid so the land will not produce?

While the world is logically moved when accidents, natural and social disasters occur, killing hundreds or thousands of people, why isn't it moved in the same way in the presence of this genocide that takes place every day right before our eyes? Intervention forces are being organized to prevent the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in eastern Zaire. What will we do to prevent one million people from dying of starvation every month in the rest of the world?

It is capitalism, neoliberalism, the laws of a savage market, foreign debt, underdevelopment and unequal terms of trade that are killing so many people in the world.

Why do we invest 700 billion dollars each year in military expenditures, and we do not invest a part of these resources in combatting hunger; soil deterioration; desertification; the deforestation of millions of hectares each year; global warming; the greenhouse effect, which increases the hurricanes, causes a lack of or excess rainfall; the destruction of the ozone layer and other natural phenomena that affect food production and the life of people on Earth?

Water is contaminated, the atmosphere is poisoned, nature is being destroyed. It is not only the scarcity of investments, the lack of education and technology, accelerated population growth; because the environment is deteriorating and the future is being compromised more and more every day.

Why are we producing more and more sophisticated weapons since the end of the cold war? What are these arms for, except to dominate the world? Why is there fierce competition to sell arms to underdeveloped countries, since they won't make them stronger in the defense of their independence and since hunger is what we must kill?

Why, on top of all this, are there criminal policies and absurd blockades, which include food and medicine, to kill an entire nation through hunger and disease? Where are ethics, justifications, respect for the most elemental human rights, the sense in such policies?

Let truth reign, not hypocrisy and lies. Let us be conscious of the fact that in this world, hegemony, arrogance and selfishness must cease.

The bells that toll today for those who die of hunger each day, will toll tomorrow for all of humanity if it doesn't try to save itself, doesn't know how to save itself, or is not wise enough to save itself.

Thank you very much.





Señor Presidente,

Señor Director General de la FAO,



El hambre, inseparable compañera de los pobres, es hija de la desigual distribución de las riquezas y de las injusticias de este mundo. Los ricos no conocen el hambre.


El colonialismo no fue ajeno al subdesarrollo y la pobreza que hoy sufre una gran parte de la humanidad. Tampoco son ajenos la hiriente opulencia y el derroche de las sociedades de consumo de las antiguas metrópolis que sumieron en la explotación a gran parte de los países de la Tierra. Por luchar contra el hambre y la injusticia han muerto en el mundo millones de personas.


¿Qué curas de mercurocromo vamos a aplicar para que dentro de 20 años haya 400 millones en vez de 800 millones de hambrientos? Estas metas son, por su sola modestia, una vergüenza.


Si 35 mil personas mueren de hambre cada día, la mitad niños, ¿por qué en los países desarrollados se arrancan olivares, se sacrifican rebaños y se pagan cuantiosas sumas para que la tierra no produzca?


Si el mundo se conmueve con razón cuando ocurren accidentes, catástrofes naturales o sociales que matan a cientos o miles de personas, ¿por qué no se conmueve de la misma forma ante este genocidio que tiene lugar cada día delante de nuestros ojos?


Se organizan fuerzas de intervención para prevenir la muerte de cientos de miles de personas en el Este de Zaire. ¿Qué es lo que haremos para evitar que mueran de hambre cada mes un millón de personas en el resto del mundo?


Son el capitalismo, el neoliberalismo, las leyes de un mercado salvaje, la deuda externa, el subdesarrollo, el intercambio desigual, los que matan a tantas personas en el mundo.


¿Por qué se invierten 700 mil millones de dólares cada año en gastos militares y no se invierte una parte de estos recursos en combatir el hambre, impedir el deterioro de los suelos, la desertificación y la deforestación de millones de hectáreas cada año, el calentamiento de la atmósfera, el efecto invernadero, que incrementa ciclones, escasez o excesos de lluvias, la destrucción de la capa de ozono y otros fenómenos naturales que afectan la producción de alimentos y la vida del hombre sobre la Tierra?


Las aguas se contaminan, la atmósfera se envenena, la naturaleza se destruye. No es sólo la escasez de inversiones, la falta de educación y tecnologías, el crecimiento acelerado de la población; es que el medio ambiente se deteriora y el futuro se compromete cada día más.


¿Por qué la producción de armas cada vez más sofisticadas después que concluyó la guerra fría? ¿Para qué se quieren esas armas sino para dominar al mundo? ¿Para qué la feroz competencia por vender armamentos a países subdesarrollados, que no los harán más poderosos para defender su independencia y donde lo que hay que matar es el hambre?


¿Por qué sumar a todo esto políticas criminales, bloqueos absurdos que incluyen alimentos y medicinas para matar de hambre y enfermedades a pueblos enteros? ¿Dónde está la ética, la justificación, el respeto a los derechos humanos más elementales, el sentido de tales políticas?


Reine la verdad y no la hipocresía y la mentira. Hagamos conciencia de que en este mundo debe cesar el hegemonismo, la arrogancia y el egoísmo.


Las campanas que doblan hoy por los que mueren de hambre cada día, doblarán mañana por la humanidad entera si no quiso, no supo o no pudo ser suficientemente sabia para salvarse a sí misma.


Muchas gracias.



Top of Page