The Johannesburg Declaration on Biopiracy, Biodiversity and Community
This declaration was developed before and during the Second South-South
Biopiracy Summit in Johannesburg. Please distribute and sign on by the end of
the Earth Summit. It can then be presented as an outcome of the Summit.
Please distribute widely. An English and Spanish version is available. We
will shortly distribute a French version. You can also access the declaration
on the following website:
The Johannesburg Declaration on Biopiracy, Biodiversity
and Community Rights
Download full text as PDF file
We, representatives of local communities, civil society organisations and
NGOs from around the world, gathered around the world and at the Earth Summit
in Johannesburg, held in August and September 2002, discussed issues relating
to the privatisation of our biological resources and the protection of the
rights of holders of indigenous knowledge and technologies, especially as
related to biodiversity.
Mindful that the content and spirit of this declaration is a culmination of
a decade of resistance to the privatisation of our food, water and
Recognising that human beings are an integral part of the web of life on
Earth and that our well-being is derived from and depends on the health of our
ecosystems and species;
Determined to ensure that human actions do not destroy this web of mutually
enhancing ecological relationship;.
Conscious and proud of the fundamental role played by local communities,
indigenous peoples, farmers and in particular women, and their traditional
knowledge in the conservation and management of biological diversity to ensure
food and health security in the past, the present and the future;
Mindful of the inextricable links between bioprospecting and genetic
Reminding everyone that the current dominant models of development driven by
economic liberalisation and corporate control, reinforce social inequalities
throughout the world and undermine the sovereignty of nation states to take
care of their people;
Aware that the increasingly powerful multinational companies are destroying
local communities and their natural resource base by privatising biological,
land and water resources and that a potent instrument in this destruction is
the patenting of living organisms;
Realising that communities have not benefited from bioprospecting, that it
has not delivered on its promises as a tool for biodiversity conservation,
social justice, and poverty alleviation, and that it has legitimised the unfair
appropriation of biological resources and knowledge.
That local communities, indigenous peoples and farmers are custodians of
biodiversity, and that they have the inalienable right and responsibility to
continue to manage, save, exchange and further develop the biodiversity under
their custody, over and above any external commercial interests.
Similarly, we consider food sovereignty - the right of people to sufficient
and healthy food at all times and access to natural resources - as a central
principle, which should not be subject to other interests or considerations.
People also have a basic right to accessible and affordable healthcare and to
the biological resources from which they derive health benefits.
We oppose the current push towards globalisation that is driven
predominantly by commercial interests and which undermines our cultures and our
capacity to sustain and control our livelihoods.
We oppose biopiracy and the patenting of our biological resources and
knowledge because it goes against our human and cultural rights and identity.
We firmly believe that benefit sharing is possible without patents.
We believe the protection of human subjects in genetic research is a human
rights issue, requiring carefully crafted social policies and laws which are
stringently monitored and enforced to protect individuals and groups from
exploitative research and practices.
We declare our opposition to the patenting of life and to the patenting of
crops and seed, because we are concerned about the removal of control of food
production from local communities and farmers to multinational corporations.
We declare that genetic engineering in food and farming presents serious and
irreversible environmental and health risks.
We believe that community rights over biodiversity and indigenous knowledge
are collective in nature, and therefore cannot be privatised or individualised.
Intellectual property rights as applied to biodiversity and traditional
knowledge are private and monopolistic in nature and therefore incompatible
with community rights. IPRs cannot exist within a traditional knowledge system
and attempts to bring these two worlds together are misguided and unacceptable.
In this context, we declare that the initiative of the World Intellectual
Property Organisation (WIPO) to develop systems for the protection of
traditional knowledge is highly inappropriate. WIPO should work to stop
biopiracy that occurs because of biodiversity patents, and not to define the
rights of communities which should be done by the communities themselves.
WE PROPOSE THAT
Concern over food and health security and the environment should take
precedence over international trade interests. The WTO is not the place to
decide on these issues. Neither should regional or bilateral trade agreements
affect local biodiversity management.
Governments should have the central responsibility to develop and implement
policies, legislation and research and to redirect these towards a holistic
approach to development, the promotion of local control over resources, and the
active participation of local communities, farmers and indigenous peoples in
We call on the international community to initiate a process to negotiate a
legally binding agreement under the CBD to prevent biopiracy, to ensure
national sovereignty over biological and genetic resources, and to protect the
rights of indigenous and local communities over their resources and knowledge.
Access to biological and genetic resources and knowledge should only be
permitted with the prior informed consent of indigenous peoples and local
communities, on the basis of the terms and conditions they set. This should be
a prerequisite for benefit sharing. Groups and individuals potentially impacted
by genetic research have a right to full and transparent disclosure of the
benefits and risks of such research, and to either give their consent or refuse
Biodiversity based and sustainable agricultural systems which are under the
control of local communities, should be adopted and promoted as the principal
mode of agricultural and other food production.
Our governments should ensure an environment free of GMOs in our countries
and in our farming systems and should support our efforts to raise awareness
amongst farmers and consumers about the real and potential impact of GE to the
environment and to human health.
There should be a total ban on the patenting of life forms and the use of
any IPRs on biodiversity and traditional knowledge. We want to see the
strengthening of community rights and Farmers Rights in the relevant
international agreements and at national level to ensure that local communities
and farmers can continue to save, exchange, nurture, use and further develop
African governments should to take steps to implement the African Model Law
for Community Rights at the national level. We also urge the global community
to support the implementation of this law and to desist from any activities or
policies that directly or indirectly undermine its adoption and operation by
We call on WTO members to amend TRIPs to reflect that all life forms and
living processes cannot be patented in any member state. We also call on WTO
members to allow countries maximum flexibility to establish sui generis systems
of protection for plant varieties that protect the rights of farmers and
indigenous communities to their resources and their traditional
WE COMMIT OURSELVES
To strengthen our efforts and campaigns to stop the patenting of life forms
and to secure our right to an environment free of GMOs.
To strengthen and promote the role of local communities, indigenous peoples,
farmers and women in biodiversity conservation and use, and to protect and
insist on their rights to do so.
To protect and enrich our local knowledge systems about biodiversity and to
actively promote diversified integrated farming and food production systems
based on biodiversity in our communities and organisations.
We promise to be as generous as the Earth, clear as the water, strong as the
wind, and as far and as close as the sun. And we pledge to exchange our seeds
of knowledge and wisdom passed on from generation to generation.
This declaration is a compilation of two recent civil society declarations:
The Valley of 1000 Hills Declaration, made KwaZulu Natal, South Africa in
March 2002, by 40 community and NGO participants from Africa.
The Rio Branco Commitment, made in Rio Branco, Brazil in May 2002, by 100
community and NGO participants from around the world.
It also reflects the viewpoints expressed by the majority of participants at
the Second South-South Biopiracy Summit, hosted in Johannesburg in August 2002.
Send signatures to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Statement of solidarity with Southern
African nations over GM food and crops
Delegates to the World Summit on Sustainable Development, We the
undersigned, as representatives or advocates of the people of the Global South,
hereby declare our condemnation of the coercive techniques being used by the
United States of America to force the nations and people of the South to accept
genetically modified food in food aid shipments.
We condemn the United States' use of Food Aid as a tool of propaganda to
force acceptance of GM food and crops by Southern nations on the eve of the
World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD).
Peasant farmers and indigenous peoples in many Southern nations are opposing
GM crops and condemning GM contamination of their land whilst the recipients of
food aid are protesting the dumping of GM food that have not undergone
independent safety testing.
We decry the bio-imperialism of dumping food aid in Africa, the endangerment
of food sovereignty and security and the deviation from principles of
It further subsidizes the US farm system, provides a handy market for
dumping grain not wanted elsewhere and is a thinly disguised attempt to pollute
the sub continent's grain stocks with patented genetically modified varieties.
We support the governments of Zambia and Mozambique for protesting about the
inclusion of genetically modified shipments of maize in food aid.
The United States' Department of State is clearly using emergency food aid
shipments for starving people in southern Africa as a political tool to force
acceptance of genetically modified foods. This exploitative policy makes it
clear that the United States is not interested in staving off famine.
The United States is forcing the people of southern African nations to
accept genetically modified food aid or risk widespread starvation, and has
been unwilling to listen to the legitimate concerns.
Genetically modified crops, such as GM coffee and Bt cotton - and the
corporations that market them - will only exacerbate rural unemployment and
social and economic inequalities, and spur further environmental degradation.
We encourage governments and people around the world to initiate a boycott
of genetically modified food products from the United States to demonstrate
support not only for southern African nations who are being used as political
pawns in a dire situation, but to show support for all the countries of the
world that have been threatened with trade sanctions by the United States for
regulating or labeling genetically modified foods.
Finally, we urge governments of the world to reject the inclusion of any
language in the WSSD declaration that presumes genetically modified foods will
be a solution to world hunger
US using WSSD to force GMOs on the world
The US is using the dire humanitarian disaster in southern Africa as a way
of forcing GMOs and Genetic Engineering on the world. It sees the World Summit
on Sustainable Development (WSSD) as its platform to get moral approval of
biotechnology, backed by three US-inspired pro-biotechnology reports. On Friday
the US launched a trade war against the EU over its refusal to accept GM foods
and seeds. The solutions lie elsewhere, as identified in ITDG's background
paper "Preserving the Web of Life",
released today in Johannesburg